Wrike vs. LiquidPlanner: Project Management Pugilism

In that location are few project management (PM) tools that can compete with LiquidPlanner. This Editors' Choice tool offers rich features, a dynamic and customizable user interface (UI), and in-depth reporting that everyone on your direction squad will honey. Only 1 notch beneath LiquidPlanner, you'll find Wrike, an easy-to-use PM tool that offers a ton of third-party integrations.

Although Wrike doesn't offer as much customization and features as LiquidPlanner or our other Editors' Choice tools Teamwork Projects or Zoho Projects, its simplicity and quick setup arrive worth consideration. Because there are so many loftier-quality PM tools on the market place, it'due south of import that you define your particular needs prior to making your selection. Y'all'll want to scrutinize each platform in terms of pricing, ease-of-employ, features, and integration support. In order to help narrow down your options, this article pits LiquidPlanner and Wrike against one some other to help yous decide which one is all-time for you.

Price

If you lot're still undecided near whether or not you truly need PM software, start with Wrike'due south robust free plan, which allows five users to work on an unlimited number of projects of upwardly to 2 GB of data. The free plan is blank-bones and doesn't feature basic tools such every bit timesheets or dashboards. One time you lot've decided to invest in PM software, you lot tin upgrade to one of Wrike'due south three paid tiers: Wrike Professional ($49 per month for upwards to v users or $99 per month for up to 15 users). If you lot need unlimited users and unlimited data, ask Wrike about its Enterprise package, which features customized pricing.

LiquidPlanner doesn't offer a gratuitous plan. The lowest-priced plan LiquidPlanner offers is the $29 per user per month Standard plan, which has a 10-user minimum requirement and a maximum of 25 active clients. The Professional plan goes up to 100 active clients for $39 per user per month, and the Enterprise plan gives you access to an unlimited number of seats. Enterprise pricing is determined on a case-by-example footing, then you'll have to asking a quote from LiquidPlanner to make up one's mind if this tier is right for your business concern.

If you've got fewer than 100 users but more than five users, yous'll definitely prefer LiquidPlanner's pricing construction. Keep in mind, however, that we tin can't definitively say which service offers a more than affordable plan at the Enterprise level, and then it'due south highly possible that Wrike is the better option if you need to add hundreds of users to your system. Edge: LiquidPlanner.

Features and UI

Wrike'south UI uses a folder-based structure that can be a bit disruptive if you're non accustomed to the organisation. Folders are essentially projects and, once a project is created, you can invite team members, add files, and transport messages. Once you become into a folder, you're essentially seeing the aforementioned things you'd see on other platforms, but this odd categorization might be a pocket-sized stumbling block for new users. However, Wrike does an fantabulous job incorporating features such as Timeline, Reports, and Pins to allow you collaborate with workflows to make changes and additions as you lot go.

LiquidPlanner's UI is a bit common cold and mechanical but, unlike Wrike, information technology's not confusing or overwhelmin (even for software neophytes). LiquidPlanner is chock-total of useful features that allow you create and proper name projects, assign various team members to tasks, fix deadlines, and add milestones. Tasks can have subtasks and projects tin have subprojects, all of which make it easier to eddy down to specific actions and requirements for each member of your team. You lot'll be able to add prioritization, time tracking, and in-depth analytics for creating, managing, and examining your workflows. Edge: LiquidPlanner.

Integrations

Wrike and LiquidPlanner both offer a healthy number of integrations with third-political party services such as Box, Dropbox, and Google Bulldoze. They are both supported past Zapier, which connects more than 500 apps within ane designated workflow.

In addition to Zapier, LiquidPlanner heavily relies on its Salesforce.com and Okta integrations to ensure your PM tool ties dorsum to the rest of your organization'south software. Wrike, on the other hand, ties back to 35 dissever tools, including Okta and Zapier. These tools include Apple Mail and Microsoft Office 365. These additions requite Wrike a articulate border in this category. Edge: Wrike.

Lesser Line

Both tools are heavyweights in the PM space. Unfortunately for Wrike, LiquidPlanner is the undisputed champion. With its more affordable price program, easy-to-use UI, and rich feature ready, information technology sits just higher up Wrike at the caput of this category. However, if third-party integrations are your main business organization, Wrike offers a more various set of offerings. Recommendation: LiquidPlanner